Forest protection in Central India: do differences in monitoring by state and local institutions result in diverse social and ecological impacts?

Agarwal, Shivani and Marathe, Aniruddha and Ghate, Rucha and Krishnaswamy, Jagdish and Nagendra, Harini (2017) Forest protection in Central India: do differences in monitoring by state and local institutions result in diverse social and ecological impacts? Biodiversity and Conservation. ISSN 0960-3115

[img] Text
BC_shivani_2017.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (968kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Protection of forests and wildlife outside protected areas (PAs) is necessary for the conservation of wildlife. Extension of conservation efforts outside the existing PA may result in restrictions on local forest resource use. Such situations arise due to differences in understanding of forest as a resource for communities and as a conservation space for endangered species. A clearer focus is needed on the functionality and socio-ecological outcomes of different forest management institutions to address such issues. We conducted a study in a forest landscape connecting Pench and Tadoba-Andhari Tiger Reserves (TRs) in Central India. The two main forest management institutions were the Forest Department (FD) and local communities managing forest resources. We conducted vegetation surveys and focus group discussions in 15 villages selected based on presence or absence of active protection and monitoring of forest resources by either FD or local people. We found that forests with monitoring had significantly higher tree density and vegetation species richness compared to forests without monitoring. Tree density was observed to be higher in sites monitored by villagers rather than those monitored by FD. Self-regulation and resource sharing in locally monitored forests were more acceptable to local communities. In forests monitored by the FD, local communities indicated a feeling of alienation from the forest that weakened their motivation to protect the forest and wildlife. Recognition of local community rights is essential to achieve conservation goals and reduce social conflicts outside PAs, requiring collaboration between state and local institutions.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Copyright of this article belongs to Springer
Uncontrolled Keywords: Forest institutions � People participation � Forest Department � Bureaucracy � Biodiversity
Subjects: C Publications by ATREEians > G Journal Papers
Divisions: Publications by ATREEians > Journal Papers
Depositing User: The Library Officer
Date Deposited: 04 May 2017 07:21
Last Modified: 04 Oct 2017 09:23
URI: http://eprints.atree.org/id/eprint/483

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item